Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
Identifieur interne : 001709 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001708; suivant : 001710Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
Auteurs : Robert Kang [États-Unis] ; Grace Liu Nimmons ; Ward Drennan ; Jeff Longnion ; Chad Ruffin ; Kaibao Nie ; Jong Ho Won ; Tina Worman ; Bevan Yueh ; Jay RubinsteinSource :
- Ear and hearing [ 1538-4667 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Implants cochléaires (MeSH), Musique (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Perception de la hauteur tonale (MeSH), Perception de la parole (MeSH), Perte d'audition (diagnostic), Perte d'audition (rééducation et réadaptation), Perte d'audition (thérapie), Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH), Seuil auditif (MeSH), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus (MeSH), Tests auditifs (méthodes), Tests auditifs (normes).
- MESH :
- diagnostic : Perte d'audition.
- méthodes : Tests auditifs.
- normes : Tests auditifs.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Perte d'audition.
- thérapie : Perte d'audition.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Femelle, Humains, Implants cochléaires, Musique, Mâle, Perception de la hauteur tonale, Perception de la parole, Reproductibilité des résultats, Seuil auditif, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Aged, 80 and over (MeSH), Auditory Threshold (MeSH), Cochlear Implants (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Hearing Loss (diagnosis), Hearing Loss (rehabilitation), Hearing Loss (therapy), Hearing Tests (methods), Hearing Tests (standards), Humans (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Music (MeSH), Pitch Perception (MeSH), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Speech Perception (MeSH).
- MESH :
- diagnosis : Hearing Loss.
- methods : Hearing Tests.
- rehabilitation : Hearing Loss.
- standards : Hearing Tests.
- therapy : Hearing Loss.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Auditory Threshold, Cochlear Implants, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Pitch Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Speech Perception.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Assessment of cochlear implant outcomes centers around speech discrimination. Despite dramatic improvements in speech perception, music perception remains a challenge for most cochlear implant users. No standardized test exists to quantify music perception in a clinically practical manner. This study presents the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) test as a reliable and valid music perception test for English-speaking, adult cochlear implant users.
DESIGN
Forty-two cochlear implant subjects were recruited from the University of Washington Medical Center cochlear implant program and referred by two implant manufacturers. Ten normal-hearing volunteers were drawn from the University of Washington Medical Center and associated campuses. A computer-driven, self-administered test was developed to examine three specific aspects of music perception: pitch direction discrimination, melody recognition, and timbre recognition. The pitch subtest used an adaptive procedure to determine just-noticeable differences for complex tone pitch direction discrimination within the range of 1 to 12 semitones. The melody and timbre subtests assessed recognition of 12 commonly known melodies played with complex tones in an isochronous manner and eight musical instruments playing an identical five-note sequence, respectively. Testing was repeated for cochlear implant subjects to evaluate test-retest reliability. Normal-hearing volunteers were also tested to demonstrate differences in performance in the two populations.
RESULTS
For cochlear implant subjects, pitch direction discrimination just-noticeable differences ranged from 1 to 8.0 semitones (Mean = 3.0, SD = 2.3). Melody and timbre recognition ranged from 0 to 94.4% correct (mean = 25.1, SD = 22.2) and 20.8 to 87.5% (mean = 45.3, SD = 16.2), respectively. Each subtest significantly correlated at least moderately with both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in steady state noise and two-talker babble. Intraclass coefficients demonstrating test-retest correlations for pitch, melody, and timbre were 0.85, 0.92, and 0.69, respectively. Normal-hearing volunteers had a mean pitch direction discrimination threshold of 1.0 semitone, the smallest interval tested, and mean melody and timbre recognition scores of 87.5 and 94.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The CAMP test discriminates a wide range of music perceptual ability in cochlear implant users. Moderate correlations were seen between music test results and both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in background noise. Test-retest reliability was moderate to strong. The CAMP test provides a reliable and valid metric for a clinically practical, standardized evaluation of music perception in adult cochlear implant users.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0
PubMed: 19474735
PubMed Central: PMC3209485
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.</title><author><name sortKey="Kang, Robert" sort="Kang, Robert" uniqKey="Kang R" first="Robert" last="Kang">Robert Kang</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7923, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7923</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Washington</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nimmons, Grace Liu" sort="Nimmons, Grace Liu" uniqKey="Nimmons G" first="Grace Liu" last="Nimmons">Grace Liu Nimmons</name></author><author><name sortKey="Drennan, Ward" sort="Drennan, Ward" uniqKey="Drennan W" first="Ward" last="Drennan">Ward Drennan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Longnion, Jeff" sort="Longnion, Jeff" uniqKey="Longnion J" first="Jeff" last="Longnion">Jeff Longnion</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ruffin, Chad" sort="Ruffin, Chad" uniqKey="Ruffin C" first="Chad" last="Ruffin">Chad Ruffin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nie, Kaibao" sort="Nie, Kaibao" uniqKey="Nie K" first="Kaibao" last="Nie">Kaibao Nie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Won, Jong Ho" sort="Won, Jong Ho" uniqKey="Won J" first="Jong Ho" last="Won">Jong Ho Won</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worman, Tina" sort="Worman, Tina" uniqKey="Worman T" first="Tina" last="Worman">Tina Worman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yueh, Bevan" sort="Yueh, Bevan" uniqKey="Yueh B" first="Bevan" last="Yueh">Bevan Yueh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rubinstein, Jay" sort="Rubinstein, Jay" uniqKey="Rubinstein J" first="Jay" last="Rubinstein">Jay Rubinstein</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19474735</idno><idno type="pmid">19474735</idno><idno type="doi">10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3209485</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001675</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001675</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001675</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001675</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001675</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.</title><author><name sortKey="Kang, Robert" sort="Kang, Robert" uniqKey="Kang R" first="Robert" last="Kang">Robert Kang</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7923, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7923</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Washington</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement><region type="state">Washington (État)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nimmons, Grace Liu" sort="Nimmons, Grace Liu" uniqKey="Nimmons G" first="Grace Liu" last="Nimmons">Grace Liu Nimmons</name></author><author><name sortKey="Drennan, Ward" sort="Drennan, Ward" uniqKey="Drennan W" first="Ward" last="Drennan">Ward Drennan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Longnion, Jeff" sort="Longnion, Jeff" uniqKey="Longnion J" first="Jeff" last="Longnion">Jeff Longnion</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ruffin, Chad" sort="Ruffin, Chad" uniqKey="Ruffin C" first="Chad" last="Ruffin">Chad Ruffin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nie, Kaibao" sort="Nie, Kaibao" uniqKey="Nie K" first="Kaibao" last="Nie">Kaibao Nie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Won, Jong Ho" sort="Won, Jong Ho" uniqKey="Won J" first="Jong Ho" last="Won">Jong Ho Won</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worman, Tina" sort="Worman, Tina" uniqKey="Worman T" first="Tina" last="Worman">Tina Worman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yueh, Bevan" sort="Yueh, Bevan" uniqKey="Yueh B" first="Bevan" last="Yueh">Bevan Yueh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rubinstein, Jay" sort="Rubinstein, Jay" uniqKey="Rubinstein J" first="Jay" last="Rubinstein">Jay Rubinstein</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Ear and hearing</title><idno type="eISSN">1538-4667</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Aged, 80 and over (MeSH)</term><term>Auditory Threshold (MeSH)</term><term>Cochlear Implants (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Hearing Loss (diagnosis)</term><term>Hearing Loss (rehabilitation)</term><term>Hearing Loss (therapy)</term><term>Hearing Tests (methods)</term><term>Hearing Tests (standards)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Music (MeSH)</term><term>Pitch Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term><term>Speech Perception (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Implants cochléaires (MeSH)</term><term>Musique (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Perception de la hauteur tonale (MeSH)</term><term>Perception de la parole (MeSH)</term><term>Perte d'audition (diagnostic)</term><term>Perte d'audition (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Perte d'audition (thérapie)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH)</term><term>Seuil auditif (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus (MeSH)</term><term>Tests auditifs (méthodes)</term><term>Tests auditifs (normes)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Hearing Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perte d'audition</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Hearing Tests</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tests auditifs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tests auditifs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Hearing Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perte d'audition</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Hearing Tests</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en"><term>Hearing Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="thérapie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perte d'audition</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Auditory Threshold</term><term>Cochlear Implants</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Music</term><term>Pitch Perception</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Speech Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants cochléaires</term><term>Musique</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Perception de la hauteur tonale</term><term>Perception de la parole</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Seuil auditif</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVES</b></p><p>Assessment of cochlear implant outcomes centers around speech discrimination. Despite dramatic improvements in speech perception, music perception remains a challenge for most cochlear implant users. No standardized test exists to quantify music perception in a clinically practical manner. This study presents the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) test as a reliable and valid music perception test for English-speaking, adult cochlear implant users.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>DESIGN</b></p><p>Forty-two cochlear implant subjects were recruited from the University of Washington Medical Center cochlear implant program and referred by two implant manufacturers. Ten normal-hearing volunteers were drawn from the University of Washington Medical Center and associated campuses. A computer-driven, self-administered test was developed to examine three specific aspects of music perception: pitch direction discrimination, melody recognition, and timbre recognition. The pitch subtest used an adaptive procedure to determine just-noticeable differences for complex tone pitch direction discrimination within the range of 1 to 12 semitones. The melody and timbre subtests assessed recognition of 12 commonly known melodies played with complex tones in an isochronous manner and eight musical instruments playing an identical five-note sequence, respectively. Testing was repeated for cochlear implant subjects to evaluate test-retest reliability. Normal-hearing volunteers were also tested to demonstrate differences in performance in the two populations.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>For cochlear implant subjects, pitch direction discrimination just-noticeable differences ranged from 1 to 8.0 semitones (Mean = 3.0, SD = 2.3). Melody and timbre recognition ranged from 0 to 94.4% correct (mean = 25.1, SD = 22.2) and 20.8 to 87.5% (mean = 45.3, SD = 16.2), respectively. Each subtest significantly correlated at least moderately with both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in steady state noise and two-talker babble. Intraclass coefficients demonstrating test-retest correlations for pitch, melody, and timbre were 0.85, 0.92, and 0.69, respectively. Normal-hearing volunteers had a mean pitch direction discrimination threshold of 1.0 semitone, the smallest interval tested, and mean melody and timbre recognition scores of 87.5 and 94.2%, respectively.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>The CAMP test discriminates a wide range of music perceptual ability in cochlear implant users. Moderate correlations were seen between music test results and both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in background noise. Test-retest reliability was moderate to strong. The CAMP test provides a reliable and valid metric for a clinically practical, standardized evaluation of music perception in adult cochlear implant users.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19474735</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1538-4667</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>30</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Ear and hearing</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ear Hear</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>411-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Assessment of cochlear implant outcomes centers around speech discrimination. Despite dramatic improvements in speech perception, music perception remains a challenge for most cochlear implant users. No standardized test exists to quantify music perception in a clinically practical manner. This study presents the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) test as a reliable and valid music perception test for English-speaking, adult cochlear implant users.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DESIGN" NlmCategory="METHODS">Forty-two cochlear implant subjects were recruited from the University of Washington Medical Center cochlear implant program and referred by two implant manufacturers. Ten normal-hearing volunteers were drawn from the University of Washington Medical Center and associated campuses. A computer-driven, self-administered test was developed to examine three specific aspects of music perception: pitch direction discrimination, melody recognition, and timbre recognition. The pitch subtest used an adaptive procedure to determine just-noticeable differences for complex tone pitch direction discrimination within the range of 1 to 12 semitones. The melody and timbre subtests assessed recognition of 12 commonly known melodies played with complex tones in an isochronous manner and eight musical instruments playing an identical five-note sequence, respectively. Testing was repeated for cochlear implant subjects to evaluate test-retest reliability. Normal-hearing volunteers were also tested to demonstrate differences in performance in the two populations.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">For cochlear implant subjects, pitch direction discrimination just-noticeable differences ranged from 1 to 8.0 semitones (Mean = 3.0, SD = 2.3). Melody and timbre recognition ranged from 0 to 94.4% correct (mean = 25.1, SD = 22.2) and 20.8 to 87.5% (mean = 45.3, SD = 16.2), respectively. Each subtest significantly correlated at least moderately with both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in steady state noise and two-talker babble. Intraclass coefficients demonstrating test-retest correlations for pitch, melody, and timbre were 0.85, 0.92, and 0.69, respectively. Normal-hearing volunteers had a mean pitch direction discrimination threshold of 1.0 semitone, the smallest interval tested, and mean melody and timbre recognition scores of 87.5 and 94.2%, respectively.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The CAMP test discriminates a wide range of music perceptual ability in cochlear implant users. Moderate correlations were seen between music test results and both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in background noise. Test-retest reliability was moderate to strong. The CAMP test provides a reliable and valid metric for a clinically practical, standardized evaluation of music perception in adult cochlear implant users.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kang</LastName><ForeName>Robert</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7923, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nimmons</LastName><ForeName>Grace Liu</ForeName><Initials>GL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Drennan</LastName><ForeName>Ward</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Longnion</LastName><ForeName>Jeff</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ruffin</LastName><ForeName>Chad</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nie</LastName><ForeName>Kaibao</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Won</LastName><ForeName>Jong Ho</ForeName><Initials>JH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Worman</LastName><ForeName>Tina</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yueh</LastName><ForeName>Bevan</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rubinstein</LastName><ForeName>Jay</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>P30 DC004661</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R01-DC007525</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>P50 DC000242</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>L30 DC008490</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R01 DC010148</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>T32 DC000018</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>P30-DC004661</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R01 DC007525</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>T32-DC00018</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>P50-DC00242</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>L30 DC008490-02</GrantID><Acronym>DC</Acronym><Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023361">Validation Study</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Ear Hear</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8005585</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0196-0202</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001309" MajorTopicYN="N">Auditory Threshold</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003054" MajorTopicYN="Y">Cochlear Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D034381" MajorTopicYN="N">Hearing Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="N">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006320" MajorTopicYN="N">Hearing Tests</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009146" MajorTopicYN="Y">Music</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010898" MajorTopicYN="N">Pitch Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013067" MajorTopicYN="N">Speech Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19474735</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3209485</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS329413</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Aug;34(4):916-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1956198</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):149-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18309572</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;8(3):384-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17587137</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):302-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17485980</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 1997 Jun;18(3):252-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9201460</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):412-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17485990</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Feb;9(1):1-19</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9493937</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002 Apr;111(4):349-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11991588</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Aug;110(2):1150-63</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11519582</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14485785</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Mar;13(3):132-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11936169</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(1):38-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16219993</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 2005 Jun;26(3):237-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15937406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Disord. 1988 Feb;53(1):42-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3339867</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):173-85</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15064662</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 Sep;123(7):826-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14575398</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Feb;124(2):125-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11226944</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8132902</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):3126-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15957780</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Jul-Aug;11(7):390-406</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10976500</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):148-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6865371</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">5541744</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cochlear Implants Int. 2002 Mar;3(1):29-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18792110</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Feb;13(1):116-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2951485</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Washington (État)</li></region><settlement><li>Seattle</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Washington</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Drennan, Ward" sort="Drennan, Ward" uniqKey="Drennan W" first="Ward" last="Drennan">Ward Drennan</name><name sortKey="Longnion, Jeff" sort="Longnion, Jeff" uniqKey="Longnion J" first="Jeff" last="Longnion">Jeff Longnion</name><name sortKey="Nie, Kaibao" sort="Nie, Kaibao" uniqKey="Nie K" first="Kaibao" last="Nie">Kaibao Nie</name><name sortKey="Nimmons, Grace Liu" sort="Nimmons, Grace Liu" uniqKey="Nimmons G" first="Grace Liu" last="Nimmons">Grace Liu Nimmons</name><name sortKey="Rubinstein, Jay" sort="Rubinstein, Jay" uniqKey="Rubinstein J" first="Jay" last="Rubinstein">Jay Rubinstein</name><name sortKey="Ruffin, Chad" sort="Ruffin, Chad" uniqKey="Ruffin C" first="Chad" last="Ruffin">Chad Ruffin</name><name sortKey="Won, Jong Ho" sort="Won, Jong Ho" uniqKey="Won J" first="Jong Ho" last="Won">Jong Ho Won</name><name sortKey="Worman, Tina" sort="Worman, Tina" uniqKey="Worman T" first="Tina" last="Worman">Tina Worman</name><name sortKey="Yueh, Bevan" sort="Yueh, Bevan" uniqKey="Yueh B" first="Bevan" last="Yueh">Bevan Yueh</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Washington (État)"><name sortKey="Kang, Robert" sort="Kang, Robert" uniqKey="Kang R" first="Robert" last="Kang">Robert Kang</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001709 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001709 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19474735
|texte= Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19474735" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |